Kenzo Jelassi
TTMIB · Worldwide Management Network

Kenzo Hakim Karim Jelassi

Central Midfielder · 6 / 8 Hybrid Projection
PSG Academy Greater Geneva · Born 2011 · Right Foot
Ireland France Spain
80.7'
Avg / Game
9,815 m
Distance / Game
+25%
Pmax Gain
16
Games Played
Contact TTMIB
01

Player Profile

Full NameKenzo Hakim Karim Jelassi
Year of Birth2011
Current ClubPSG Academy – Greater Geneva
NationalityIreland · France · Spain
Height / Weight163–164 cm / 47–49 kg
Preferred FootRight
Primary PositionCentral Midfielder (CM · 6/8 hybrid)
Alt. PositionsDM · RB · AM / 10
Growth PhasePHV window — active monitoring
SomatotypeEcto-Mesomorph 1.71 – 3.14 – 4.42
Classification & Coachability

PSG Academy describes Kenzo as a "joueur complet" — a complete player with no single-attribute dependency. Applied, attentive, and focused in every session.

Active development: mobility/flexibility and plyometric capacity — both showing positive trends. Long-term projection: hybrid 6/8 central midfielder at elite academy level.

Applied Attentive Consistent PHV Phase Scalable
02

Technical & Tactical Profile

Qualitative scouting assessment — Season 2025–26 · PSG Academy Greater Geneva · Source: direct observation

Technical Profile
First TouchGood — controlled under pressure; reliable in tight situations
Ball RetentionGood — beats pressure with ease and confidence; solid 1v1 hold-up
Passing ProfileShort & forward passes dominant — develops good rhythm; long-range passing identified as next development target
Weak FootFunctional in matches — uses both feet; no significant liability
Press ResistanceGood — solid balance and footwork; maintains possession under direct pressure
Tactical Profile
ScanningSatisfactory — checks surroundings regularly before receiving; consistent habit observed
Body OrientationSatisfactory — receives on the half-turn; room for improvement in optimal positioning
Counter-PressGood — fast status transition; reacts immediately after ball loss; high work-rate
Rest DefenceIntelligent — anticipates collective turnovers well; positionally aware off the ball
Space OccupationVery mobile — covers wide zones and compensates for teammates; energy management identified as next tactical growth area
Technically complete for his age group with no critical weak points. The combination of two-footedness, press resistance, and intelligent rest-defence positioning reflects PSG's "joueur complet" profile. Primary development priority: extend passing range and refine energy distribution in zone occupation.
Two-Footed Press Resistant Fast Transition Intelligent Off-Ball Long Pass: In Development Energy Mgmt: In Development
03

Anthropometric Assessment

Key Metrics (PSG Report · 16 Jan 2026)
Metric Value Note
Height164.0 cmPHV phase
Weight48.35 kgLean build
Σ 8 Skinfolds49.2 mmLow adiposity
Body Fat (Faulkner)18.3 %No intervention required
Body Fat (Yuhasz)9.1 %Reference method
Muscle Mass (Lee)49.1 %Age-appropriate (PHV)
Fat Mass4.4 kgMinimal / appropriate
Lean Mass43.9 kgStrong base for loading
Somatotype1.71 – 3.14 – 4.42Ecto-mesomorph
Interpretation & Development Notes

Low-adiposity profile (Σ8 = 49.2 mm) and lean mass structure confirm a scalable midfield physique. No fat-management intervention required.

Dominant ectomorphy indicates a linear, high-mobility frame commonly observed in technically oriented central midfielders. Mesomorphy is expected to increase post-PHV.

Peer comparison: 3rd lowest Σ8 across the full 30-player PSG cohort measured on 16 Jan 2026 — confirms genuine structural leanness.

Timing is correct: the anthropometric baseline supports the planned plyometric block while maintaining careful PHV load management (mobility + bilateral screening).
04

Physical Performance

Sprint & Acceleration — October to December 2025

Improvement across the full curve (5–30 m) confirms systemic neuromuscular development. Sharpest gains at 5 m and 10 m — first-step quickness, pressing initiation, duel engagement.

DistanceOct 2025Dec 2025DifferenceImprovement
5 m1.35 s1.22 s-0.13 s9.6%
10 m2.22 s2.06 s-0.16 s7.2%
20 m3.66 s3.54 s-0.12 s3.3%
30 m5.03 s4.87 s-0.16 s3.2%
Force–Velocity Profile
ParameterOct 2025Dec 2025Change
F0 (N/kg)7.729.95+2.23
V0 (m/s)7.577.34Stable
Pmax (W)666832+166 (+25%)

Vmax 29.65 km/h · 505 Agility: 2.30 s · 1 km: 4:01 stable

Elastic Strength — Jump Tests
TestOct 2025Dec 2025Change
CMJ26.28 cm27.89 cm+1.61 cm
SJ24.82 cm24.70 cmStable
Abalakov32.13 cm31.39 cmCoord. var.

CMJ/SJ divergence confirms positive SSC efficiency. Plyometric block scheduled.

The Pmax gain of +166 W (25%) within a single testing block signals a structural shift toward better horizontal force application — precisely the explosive output most relevant for a central midfielder in a high-pressing system.
05

Match Load & Reliability

Avg Minutes
80.7
per game · 16 games
Avg Distance
9,815
metres per game
Peak Distance
12,539
m — vs Annecy (98 min)
Avg HSR >20 km/h
1,659
metres per game
MatchDateMinDistance>20 km/h>25 km/hG
U15 vs Allinges09/09/2566.48,080 m938 m191 m1
FC Donzelle U1517/09/2566.38,501 m1,173 m209 m0
U15 vs Meyrin03/10/2595.710,042 m1,562 m208 m0
U15 vs FC MeyrinOct 2589.411,741 m2,459 m491 m0
U15 vs Aix18/10/2585.510,971 m1,900 m366 m0
U15 vs Lombardia Uno28/10/2581.610,608 m1,642 m377 m0
U15 vs Sedriano30/10/2570.39,707 m1,902 m309 m0
U15 vs Vessy08/11/2582.89,539 m1,341 m265 m0
U15 vs Reignier12/11/2586.210,619 m1,890 m369 m0
U15 vs Team Riviera29/11/2591.09,251 m1,657 m514 m0
U15 vs Bas Valais06/12/2588.510,164 m1,543 m330 m0
U15 vs Biel13/12/2560.76,899 m1,143 m356 m0
U15 vs Annecy ★17/01/2698.212,539 m1,797 m306 m0
U15 vs TEGG 21/01/2683.410,053 m2,229 m545 m0
U15 vs Etoile Carouge24/01/2682.010,484 m1,932 m373 m0
U15 vs Servette GE 28/01/26
U15 vs Thonon 04/02/2663.87,840 m1,436 m265 m0
Averaging 80.7 minutes across 16 games is a clear indicator of physical durability and coach trust. Load stability alongside force and power gains is a key differentiator in NLZ evaluation.
06

Match Footage

Three verified Veo recordings from the 2025–26 season. Available for scouting review via the links below.

07

Three-Year Projection

Physical Targets
Tactical Targets
Y1
U15–U16
Foundation
Physical
Cement acceleration gains; build reactive strength through plyometrics; preserve elastic qualities through PHV window
Tactical
Stabilise CM role; increase duel engagement; develop pressing mechanics and positional discipline
Y2
U16–U17
Integration
Physical
Structured strength block; raise Pmax baseline; bilateral symmetry work; Vmax extension
Tactical
Midfield dominance under pressure; tactical flexibility CM/DM; increase line-breaking capacity
Y3
U17–U18
Elite Level
Physical
Hybrid physical profile: force/velocity balance fit for top-tier academy; full athletic expression
Tactical
Hybrid 6/8 profile at elite academy level; leadership in midfield organisation; NLZ-ready
This profile is not predicated on early physical dominance — it is built on measurable progression capacity, which carries the higher predictive value in long-term academy contexts.
Confirmed Performance Signals
Full acceleration curve improved5m -0.13 · 10m -0.16 · 20m -0.12 · 30m -0.16 sConfirmed
Significant power output gainPmax: +166 W (+25%)Confirmed
Improved force applicationF0: 7.72 to 9.95 N/kgConfirmed
Elastic strength developmentCMJ: +1.61 cm (SSC-driven)Confirmed
High match load tolerance16 games · avg 80.7 min · 9,815 mConfirmed
Positive coachabilityApplied, attentive, consistentConfirmed
Strategic Context
Spanish PassportIn process via mother — EU eligibility and full European pathway access across all major leagues
Triple NationalityIreland · France · Spain — maximum registration and transfer flexibility across European football
Development PathwayCM/DM projection at senior level — aligned with structured elite European academy environments
RepresentationManaged exclusively by TTMIB Worldwide Management Network. All inquiries via Dietmar Wendorff.

Get in Touch

TTMIB — Worldwide Management Network
Dietmar Wendorff · Representative